<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10236</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that the Commissioner (Appeals) has sufficient powers to address issues related to natural justice despite certain provisions being deleted. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe, affirming the availability of statutory appeal mechanisms for seeking redressal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 33 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10236</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Income-tax Act, 1961, emphasizing that the Commissioner (Appeals) has sufficient powers to address issues related to natural justice despite certain provisions being deleted. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe, affirming the availability of statutory appeal mechanisms for seeking redressal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>