<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1444 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195100</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the construction of the residential building within the stipulated period and grant the exemption under Section 54F. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the extended due date under Section 139(4) for compliance with Section 54F and corrected the incorrect application of the cost inflation index by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2017 07:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1444 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195100</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the construction of the residential building within the stipulated period and grant the exemption under Section 54F. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the extended due date under Section 139(4) for compliance with Section 54F and corrected the incorrect application of the cost inflation index by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>