https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195096 The Bombay HC noted that the first two questions in the appeal had already been answered in favour of the assessee, and the claim had been granted by the Assessing Officer on remand. On the third question, the Court followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and held that no substantial question of law arose. The appeal therefore failed on that issue, leaving no basis for further interference. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Oct 2017 07:54:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195096 The Bombay HC noted that the first two questions in the appeal had already been answered in favour of the assessee, and the claim had been granted by the Assessing Officer on remand. On the third question, the Court followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and held that no substantial question of law arose. The appeal therefore failed on that issue, leaving no basis for further interference. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195096