https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195082 The Supreme Court held that the State's executive order, which classified socially and educationally backward classes based solely on caste and reserved an excessive 68% of seats, was invalid. The Court emphasized that reservations under Article 15(4) should not exclude the rest of society and suggested a reasonable reservation should be below 50%. The Court restrained the respondents from implementing the order and highlighted the importance of a rational and scientific approach to achieve social and economic justice. en-us Fri, 28 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:24:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195082 The Supreme Court held that the State's executive order, which classified socially and educationally backward classes based solely on caste and reserved an excessive 68% of seats, was invalid. The Court emphasized that reservations under Article 15(4) should not exclude the rest of society and suggested a reasonable reservation should be below 50%. The Court restrained the respondents from implementing the order and highlighted the importance of a rational and scientific approach to achieve social and economic justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195082