<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 531 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195075</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in the case and clarified the appropriate remedy under Sec. 35G of the Central Excise Act. It directed that appeals should be filed in the High Court following the amendment. Special leave petitions were dismissed, allowing the parties the liberty to approach the High Court for appeal on the same cause of action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 531 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195075</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay in the case and clarified the appropriate remedy under Sec. 35G of the Central Excise Act. It directed that appeals should be filed in the High Court following the amendment. Special leave petitions were dismissed, allowing the parties the liberty to approach the High Court for appeal on the same cause of action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>