<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10225</link>
    <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD held that exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 does not apply to a cinema building, as it is not considered a house for habitation. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming that a cinema building does not qualify for the exemption meant for residential properties. The judgment favored the Revenue, clarifying the distinction between a house and a commercial building like a cinema hall owned by a partner in a firm. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 34 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10225</link>
      <description>The High Court of ALLAHABAD held that exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 does not apply to a cinema building, as it is not considered a house for habitation. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming that a cinema building does not qualify for the exemption meant for residential properties. The judgment favored the Revenue, clarifying the distinction between a house and a commercial building like a cinema hall owned by a partner in a firm. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>