https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195068 Sections 195 and 340 CrPC were held inapplicable to allegations of false information, false statement and related offences where the alleged fabrication was not confined to the court, even if the material was used in judicial proceedings. The Court also treated the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier unsuccessful Section 482 challenge as suppression of material facts and an abuse of process. In that background, no ground was found to interfere with the order refusing discharge under Section 239 CrPC, and the challenge to the prosecution was rejected. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:28:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195068 Sections 195 and 340 CrPC were held inapplicable to allegations of false information, false statement and related offences where the alleged fabrication was not confined to the court, even if the material was used in judicial proceedings. The Court also treated the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier unsuccessful Section 482 challenge as suppression of material facts and an abuse of process. In that background, no ground was found to interfere with the order refusing discharge under Section 239 CrPC, and the challenge to the prosecution was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195068