https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349440 Transfer under a discretionary service policy was upheld where the authorities showed administrative exigency and no mala fides, bias, or lack of authority. Family inconvenience and a child's school education were held insufficient to displace the transfer, particularly where the spouse was employed and available to care for the child. The challenge based on continuous stay in Mumbai also failed because the officer had already served there for nearly fourteen years on the material placed. Spouse posting did not create an absolute bar to transfer, and no interim relief was warranted against the transfer order or the tribunal's refusal. en-us Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:26:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349440 Transfer under a discretionary service policy was upheld where the authorities showed administrative exigency and no mala fides, bias, or lack of authority. Family inconvenience and a child's school education were held insufficient to displace the transfer, particularly where the spouse was employed and available to care for the child. The challenge based on continuous stay in Mumbai also failed because the officer had already served there for nearly fourteen years on the material placed. Spouse posting did not create an absolute bar to transfer, and no interim relief was warranted against the transfer order or the tribunal's refusal. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349440