<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order directing the computation of income from House Property based on municipal value, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was limited to actual expenses, as confirmed by the Tribunal, which dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on this ground. Regarding the enhancement of &#039;book profit&#039; under Section 115JB, the Tribunal directed the AO to modify the computation without including the disallowance under Section 14A. The revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was dismissed, while the appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was partly allowed with specific directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order directing the computation of income from House Property based on municipal value, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was limited to actual expenses, as confirmed by the Tribunal, which dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on this ground. Regarding the enhancement of &#039;book profit&#039; under Section 115JB, the Tribunal directed the AO to modify the computation without including the disallowance under Section 14A. The revenue&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was dismissed, while the appeal for A.Y. 2011-12 was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The assessee&#039;s appeal for A.Y. 2010-11 was partly allowed with specific directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>