<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 589 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all grounds, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and directing the AO to allow the claimed deductions. The Tribunal held that the disallowance of Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) as capital loss, enhancement of income related to SAR, pre-commencement expenditure disallowance, disallowance under Section 14A, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) were not justified. The order was pronounced on 09/10/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 589 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all grounds, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and directing the AO to allow the claimed deductions. The Tribunal held that the disallowance of Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) as capital loss, enhancement of income related to SAR, pre-commencement expenditure disallowance, disallowance under Section 14A, and disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) were not justified. The order was pronounced on 09/10/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>