<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 586 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for netting interest on Income Tax Refund. The decision was based on the genuine belief of the assessee, adequate disclosure of claim particulars, and previous acceptance of the claim in quantum proceedings. The Tribunal held that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars warranting the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 586 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for netting interest on Income Tax Refund. The decision was based on the genuine belief of the assessee, adequate disclosure of claim particulars, and previous acceptance of the claim in quantum proceedings. The Tribunal held that the assessee did not furnish inaccurate particulars warranting the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>