<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 573 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349418</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected and enhanced merely on the basis of market enquiry or NIDB data unless the department first establishes valid grounds for rejection and follows the prescribed valuation sequence for redetermination. The declared invoice value here was not shown to be unsupported by evidence or otherwise non-genuine, and the reliance placed on a retracted statement together with NIDB data was held to be an improper basis for fixing assessable value. The enhancement was therefore unsustainable, and the order sustaining it was set aside, with complete relief granted against the valuation enhancement and consequential demand and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 573 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349418</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value of imported goods cannot be rejected and enhanced merely on the basis of market enquiry or NIDB data unless the department first establishes valid grounds for rejection and follows the prescribed valuation sequence for redetermination. The declared invoice value here was not shown to be unsupported by evidence or otherwise non-genuine, and the reliance placed on a retracted statement together with NIDB data was held to be an improper basis for fixing assessable value. The enhancement was therefore unsustainable, and the order sustaining it was set aside, with complete relief granted against the valuation enhancement and consequential demand and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>