https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349411 A tenancy dispute for eviction and recovery of rent was held non-arbitrable, so a civil suit could not be referred to arbitration merely because the lease contained an arbitration clause. The Court applied the settled principle that eviction matters falling within the class of non-arbitrable tenancy disputes remain for civil adjudication. It also held that exemption from rent-control protection did not change the forum: once the special rent statute ceased to apply, the parties' rights were governed by the Transfer of Property Act, and the civil court remained the proper forum. The appeal therefore failed and the suit was maintainable. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349411 A tenancy dispute for eviction and recovery of rent was held non-arbitrable, so a civil suit could not be referred to arbitration merely because the lease contained an arbitration clause. The Court applied the settled principle that eviction matters falling within the class of non-arbitrable tenancy disputes remain for civil adjudication. It also held that exemption from rent-control protection did not change the forum: once the special rent statute ceased to apply, the parties' rights were governed by the Transfer of Property Act, and the civil court remained the proper forum. The appeal therefore failed and the suit was maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349411