<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 565 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349410</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a council&#039;s prima facie opinion and the resulting disciplinary proceedings was barred by constructive res judicata because the petitioners had already questioned the same show-cause notice and opinion before the Bombay High Court. The later petition arose from the same cause of action, and additional RTI material only supplied further support for an issue that could have been raised earlier. Applying constructive res judicata, the court held that a plea available in the earlier proceedings could not be reagitated in a subsequent writ petition, and the challenge was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 565 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349410</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a council&#039;s prima facie opinion and the resulting disciplinary proceedings was barred by constructive res judicata because the petitioners had already questioned the same show-cause notice and opinion before the Bombay High Court. The later petition arose from the same cause of action, and additional RTI material only supplied further support for an issue that could have been raised earlier. Applying constructive res judicata, the court held that a plea available in the earlier proceedings could not be reagitated in a subsequent writ petition, and the challenge was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>