<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 555 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming service tax demand against the appellant for the period from May 2005 to July 2008. The case was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication to verify the reconciliation statement and assess if the extended period of limitation should be invoked. The appellant was granted a personal hearing before a new decision was made. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was disposed of with the judgment pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 555 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming service tax demand against the appellant for the period from May 2005 to July 2008. The case was remanded to the original authority for fresh adjudication to verify the reconciliation statement and assess if the extended period of limitation should be invoked. The appellant was granted a personal hearing before a new decision was made. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was disposed of with the judgment pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>