https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349391 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess molasses stock and penalties imposed in two cases due to incorrect Dip Reading method for stock quantification. Emphasizing adherence to established case laws and precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, citing discrepancies in stock records and the control of molasses movement by State Excise authorities. The judgments underscored the significance of accurate quantification methods and following legal precedents for fair outcomes in excise-related matters. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349391 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess molasses stock and penalties imposed in two cases due to incorrect Dip Reading method for stock quantification. Emphasizing adherence to established case laws and precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, citing discrepancies in stock records and the control of molasses movement by State Excise authorities. The judgments underscored the significance of accurate quantification methods and following legal precedents for fair outcomes in excise-related matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349391