<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1711 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195055</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee on both issues. It directed the deletion of additions made under Section 68 related to alleged bogus long-term capital gains and disallowed the application of Section 14A read with Rule 8D for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The judgment emphasized the need for concrete evidence and proper application of legal provisions before making additions or disallowances in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1711 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195055</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee on both issues. It directed the deletion of additions made under Section 68 related to alleged bogus long-term capital gains and disallowed the application of Section 14A read with Rule 8D for the Assessment Year 2005-06. The judgment emphasized the need for concrete evidence and proper application of legal provisions before making additions or disallowances in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>