<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 934 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195041</link>
    <description>A Commissioner under the Workmen&#039;s Compensation Act is not a court in the technical sense because the Act creates a special forum with limited statutory jurisdiction, bars civil court intervention, and is designed for speedy, inexpensive adjudication of compensation claims. The fact that the Commissioner&#039;s procedure has some trappings of a court is not decisive. As a result, an order made by a single Judge in an appeal under Section 30 of the Act does not become a judgment under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent merely because it is delivered by the High Court, and a Letters Patent Appeal does not lie.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 14:13:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 934 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195041</link>
      <description>A Commissioner under the Workmen&#039;s Compensation Act is not a court in the technical sense because the Act creates a special forum with limited statutory jurisdiction, bars civil court intervention, and is designed for speedy, inexpensive adjudication of compensation claims. The fact that the Commissioner&#039;s procedure has some trappings of a court is not decisive. As a result, an order made by a single Judge in an appeal under Section 30 of the Act does not become a judgment under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent merely because it is delivered by the High Court, and a Letters Patent Appeal does not lie.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>