<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349375</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of the addition by the ld. CIT(A). The ITAT found that the payments made by the assessee to JV partners were reimbursements, not subject to TDS, as there was no profit element in the transactions. The decision was based on contractual arrangements, absence of profit element, and legal precedents, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee on 05.10.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 530 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349375</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the deletion of the addition by the ld. CIT(A). The ITAT found that the payments made by the assessee to JV partners were reimbursements, not subject to TDS, as there was no profit element in the transactions. The decision was based on contractual arrangements, absence of profit element, and legal precedents, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee on 05.10.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>