<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 525 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reopening of the case under Section 148 and deleting the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s actions were based on suspicions without tangible material or independent verification. The assessee successfully proved the identity, capacity, and genuineness of the transaction, and the survey statement had no evidentiary value. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 525 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reopening of the case under Section 148 and deleting the addition of Rs. 50 lakhs. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s actions were based on suspicions without tangible material or independent verification. The assessee successfully proved the identity, capacity, and genuineness of the transaction, and the survey statement had no evidentiary value. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>