https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349352 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over input service credit availed from two service providers sharing a common registration number. The appellant, engaged in Insurance Auxiliary Service, successfully argued that denial of credit based on the shared registration number was unjustified since both providers were under the same proprietorship, initially had a common registration, and M/s. Allied Risk Management had paid service tax collected from the appellant. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349352 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a dispute over input service credit availed from two service providers sharing a common registration number. The appellant, engaged in Insurance Auxiliary Service, successfully argued that denial of credit based on the shared registration number was unjustified since both providers were under the same proprietorship, initially had a common registration, and M/s. Allied Risk Management had paid service tax collected from the appellant. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision, allowing the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349352