<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 497 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the product in question was classified as unmanufactured tobacco, not subject to Central Excise duty. The Panchnamas and statements were deemed unreliable, and no evidence supported the Revenue&#039;s claim. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, including the demand for Central Excise duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods. The appeals were allowed, and the appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2017 18:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 497 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the product in question was classified as unmanufactured tobacco, not subject to Central Excise duty. The Panchnamas and statements were deemed unreliable, and no evidence supported the Revenue&#039;s claim. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original, including the demand for Central Excise duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods. The appeals were allowed, and the appellants were entitled to consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>