<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for interest and penalty imposed on the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant promptly rectified the excess cenvat credit upon notification, demonstrating no malafide intention. The Tribunal acknowledged that ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse but considered the appellant&#039;s immediate action as indicative of good faith. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that no penalty should be imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for interest and penalty imposed on the appellant, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant promptly rectified the excess cenvat credit upon notification, demonstrating no malafide intention. The Tribunal acknowledged that ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse but considered the appellant&#039;s immediate action as indicative of good faith. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that no penalty should be imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>