https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349339 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order, and granted consequential relief to the appellants. The charge of clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable solely on the basis of average consumption of inputs and inculpatory statements without corroborative evidence. The absence of concrete proof like electricity consumption, additional packing material, payment records for clandestine removal, and transportation details led to the favorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:18:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349339 The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order, and granted consequential relief to the appellants. The charge of clandestine removal was deemed unsustainable solely on the basis of average consumption of inputs and inculpatory statements without corroborative evidence. The absence of concrete proof like electricity consumption, additional packing material, payment records for clandestine removal, and transportation details led to the favorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349339