https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349338 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a case concerning input service tax credit on erection and commissioning services provided by subcontractors. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the credit, citing legal precedents and emphasizing the separate invoicing for goods and services. The impugned order demanding repayment of wrongly availed credit, interest, and penalty was set aside. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:18:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349338 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a case concerning input service tax credit on erection and commissioning services provided by subcontractors. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the credit, citing legal precedents and emphasizing the separate invoicing for goods and services. The impugned order demanding repayment of wrongly availed credit, interest, and penalty was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349338