https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195024 Writ compensation under Article 226 was held available where a child died after falling into an uncovered sewerage tank, and the refusal to grant relief on the ground that negligence could not be identified in writ proceedings was found unjustified. The Court accepted that, on the facts, monetary compensation could be directed in the writ petition itself. Relief was therefore granted against the State, with liberty to recover the amount from the responsible authority or persons in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:28:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195024 Writ compensation under Article 226 was held available where a child died after falling into an uncovered sewerage tank, and the refusal to grant relief on the ground that negligence could not be identified in writ proceedings was found unjustified. The Court accepted that, on the facts, monetary compensation could be directed in the writ petition itself. Relief was therefore granted against the State, with liberty to recover the amount from the responsible authority or persons in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195024