https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195020 An instrument executed outside India and insufficiently stamped could be impounded and admitted in evidence on payment of the proper duty and penalty; the bar in the proviso to Section 32 of the Indian Stamp Act did not prevent that course, and admissibility could not later be questioned after admission. The premises were found to have been let for residential use on the basis of the pleadings, lease deed and admitted occupation. Ownership was proved through the landlord's testimony and the lease deed, with no effective rebuttal. Bona fide need under rent control law was upheld on concurrent findings that the landlord and his wife had retired and wished to reside in India, with no substantial question of law for interference in second appeal. en-us Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195020 An instrument executed outside India and insufficiently stamped could be impounded and admitted in evidence on payment of the proper duty and penalty; the bar in the proviso to Section 32 of the Indian Stamp Act did not prevent that course, and admissibility could not later be questioned after admission. The premises were found to have been let for residential use on the basis of the pleadings, lease deed and admitted occupation. Ownership was proved through the landlord's testimony and the lease deed, with no effective rebuttal. Bona fide need under rent control law was upheld on concurrent findings that the landlord and his wife had retired and wished to reside in India, with no substantial question of law for interference in second appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195020