https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195018 The court dismissed the writ application due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing that the cause of action must arise within its limits. The interim order was declared null and void as the court lacked jurisdiction. The arbitration clause specifying Delhi as the venue was upheld, supporting the lack of jurisdiction for the current court. Allegations of conspiracy were dismissed for lack of evidence. The petitioners were granted liberty to seek relief in a suitable forum, highlighting the importance of territorial jurisdiction and contractual agreements. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:29:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195018 The court dismissed the writ application due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing that the cause of action must arise within its limits. The interim order was declared null and void as the court lacked jurisdiction. The arbitration clause specifying Delhi as the venue was upheld, supporting the lack of jurisdiction for the current court. Allegations of conspiracy were dismissed for lack of evidence. The petitioners were granted liberty to seek relief in a suitable forum, highlighting the importance of territorial jurisdiction and contractual agreements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195018