<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10200</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating there were no substantial questions of law. It emphasized that issues concerning relief under section 80HHC are debatable and should be resolved through regular assessment procedures, not rectification proceedings under section 154. The court held that rectification is not appropriate for matters like the treatment of losses in deductions under section 80HHC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10200</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating there were no substantial questions of law. It emphasized that issues concerning relief under section 80HHC are debatable and should be resolved through regular assessment procedures, not rectification proceedings under section 154. The court held that rectification is not appropriate for matters like the treatment of losses in deductions under section 80HHC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>