<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10199</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on limitation and jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the notice, seeking to reassess income for a previous year, was within the prescribed limitation period and had the necessary sanction from the Commissioner. It was noted that the failure to examine the assessee&#039;s account books could warrant reassessment under section 147, with specific provisions addressing cases of under-assessed income. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to challenge the reassessment on its merits subsequently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10199</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s challenge based on limitation and jurisdiction. The court emphasized that the notice, seeking to reassess income for a previous year, was within the prescribed limitation period and had the necessary sanction from the Commissioner. It was noted that the failure to examine the assessee&#039;s account books could warrant reassessment under section 147, with specific provisions addressing cases of under-assessed income. The court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to challenge the reassessment on its merits subsequently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>