<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349316</link>
    <description>Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 13/2010-Cus was available for broadcasting equipment imported for the Commonwealth Games 2010 where the substantive conditions were satisfied. The goods were certified by the Director (Engineering) of Doordarshan, used for the Games, and later re-exported; the missing Organising Committee certificate and the undertaking being furnished by the appellant were treated as procedural defects only. In light of the facilitative circular and the urgency of the event, absence of misuse or diversion meant denial of exemption was unjustified, and the duty and penalty demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 471 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349316</link>
      <description>Customs duty exemption under Notification No. 13/2010-Cus was available for broadcasting equipment imported for the Commonwealth Games 2010 where the substantive conditions were satisfied. The goods were certified by the Director (Engineering) of Doordarshan, used for the Games, and later re-exported; the missing Organising Committee certificate and the undertaking being furnished by the appellant were treated as procedural defects only. In light of the facilitative circular and the urgency of the event, absence of misuse or diversion meant denial of exemption was unjustified, and the duty and penalty demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>