https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349302 The court found that the complaint lacked specific averments to implicate the petitioner under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As the petitioner was not shown to be in charge of or responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs, the proceedings against her were quashed for being an abuse of process of law. The order allowed the Criminal Original Petition, quashing the complaint against the petitioner and directing the trial to proceed against the other accused within four months. en-us Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:10:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349302 The court found that the complaint lacked specific averments to implicate the petitioner under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. As the petitioner was not shown to be in charge of or responsible for the company's day-to-day affairs, the proceedings against her were quashed for being an abuse of process of law. The order allowed the Criminal Original Petition, quashing the complaint against the petitioner and directing the trial to proceed against the other accused within four months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349302