<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority for fresh determination on the tax liability of turnkey projects under works contract service. The Tribunal emphasized that the exemption by exclusion did not apply to turnkey projects, stating that the activities in the contract could not be segregated to fit the distinct activities listed in the definition of &quot;works contract.&quot; The decision highlighted the taxability of works contract service post-June 1, 2007, expanding the scope of taxable activities. The appellant&#039;s contracts for sewage treatment plants/water treatment plants required further scrutiny for tax liability under relevant sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the original authority for fresh determination on the tax liability of turnkey projects under works contract service. The Tribunal emphasized that the exemption by exclusion did not apply to turnkey projects, stating that the activities in the contract could not be segregated to fit the distinct activities listed in the definition of &quot;works contract.&quot; The decision highlighted the taxability of works contract service post-June 1, 2007, expanding the scope of taxable activities. The appellant&#039;s contracts for sewage treatment plants/water treatment plants required further scrutiny for tax liability under relevant sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>