<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349292</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal should not have been dismissed solely on the grounds of limitation by the first appellate authority. The matter was remitted back to the first appellate authority with directions to reconsider the appeal on its merits, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice. The appeal was ultimately disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349292</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal should not have been dismissed solely on the grounds of limitation by the first appellate authority. The matter was remitted back to the first appellate authority with directions to reconsider the appeal on its merits, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice. The appeal was ultimately disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>