<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10193</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption on export profits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act was dismissed by the court. The court emphasized the mandatory requirement of filing a disclaimer certificate in Form No. 10CCAB to prevent multiple claims on the same export turnover. As the appellant failed to provide this certificate, their claim was not considered eligible, and the appeal was ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 33 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10193</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption on export profits under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act was dismissed by the court. The court emphasized the mandatory requirement of filing a disclaimer certificate in Form No. 10CCAB to prevent multiple claims on the same export turnover. As the appellant failed to provide this certificate, their claim was not considered eligible, and the appeal was ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>