https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349287 The appellant, a service provider, was held liable for tax under sections 65(105)(w) and 65(105)(k) of the Finance Act, 1994 for providing 'security agency service' and 'manpower recruitment or supply service' from February 2005 to December 2008. Despite the appellant's arguments regarding ignorance of tax liability and not being a 'commercial concern,' the tribunal found them responsible for tax payment as they had collected service tax from recipients. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's claims were not substantiated by the evidence presented. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349287 The appellant, a service provider, was held liable for tax under sections 65(105)(w) and 65(105)(k) of the Finance Act, 1994 for providing 'security agency service' and 'manpower recruitment or supply service' from February 2005 to December 2008. Despite the appellant's arguments regarding ignorance of tax liability and not being a 'commercial concern,' the tribunal found them responsible for tax payment as they had collected service tax from recipients. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant's claims were not substantiated by the evidence presented. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349287