https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349281 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order allowing redemption of seized cash on payment of a fine, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the reliance on challenged case law was justified as there was no stay order from the High Court. Despite certain submissions not being considered by the Commissioner, the Tribunal deemed it insufficient to set aside the order. The respondent's cross-objections were not addressed due to a failure to file within the stipulated period, leading to the denial of their request for additional time. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:09:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349281 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order allowing redemption of seized cash on payment of a fine, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal found that the reliance on challenged case law was justified as there was no stay order from the High Court. Despite certain submissions not being considered by the Commissioner, the Tribunal deemed it insufficient to set aside the order. The respondent's cross-objections were not addressed due to a failure to file within the stipulated period, leading to the denial of their request for additional time. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349281