<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1702 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194998</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was found to have transferred his shares and ceased to be a shareholder, thus lacking the standing to file the petition. The court held that the petitioner did not meet the qualifications under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, to maintain the petition. Consequently, the petition was deemed not maintainable, interim orders were vacated, pending applications were disposed of, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:08:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1702 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194998</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was found to have transferred his shares and ceased to be a shareholder, thus lacking the standing to file the petition. The court held that the petitioner did not meet the qualifications under Section 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, to maintain the petition. Consequently, the petition was deemed not maintainable, interim orders were vacated, pending applications were disposed of, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>