https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195004 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a writ petition concerning a tender process for railway infrastructure construction. The petitioners raised concerns about potential collusion in the process. The court directed the impleadment of additional respondents and allowed the tendering authority to proceed with evaluating all qualified bidders' financial bids. The petitioners were advised to challenge the qualification decision of specific bidders through proper legal channels if dissatisfied. The case was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the authority's discretion in handling the tender process. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:08:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195004 The High Court of Calcutta addressed a writ petition concerning a tender process for railway infrastructure construction. The petitioners raised concerns about potential collusion in the process. The court directed the impleadment of additional respondents and allowed the tendering authority to proceed with evaluating all qualified bidders' financial bids. The petitioners were advised to challenge the qualification decision of specific bidders through proper legal channels if dissatisfied. The case was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the authority's discretion in handling the tender process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195004