https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194990 Defects in signing, verification and presentation of a plaint were treated as procedural irregularities, not conditions affecting the existence of the suit. A plaint signed by one of several plaintiffs was sufficient, and presentation was not confined to the plaintiff personally or to a particular authorised agent. Although verification by a person not shown to know the facts was defective, it remained a curable irregularity. Once corrected, the amendment related back to the original date of presentation, so the suit was not treated as instituted only from the date of rectification. The company's conversion from private to public did not alter its identity or invalidate the suit. en-us Wed, 30 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194990 Defects in signing, verification and presentation of a plaint were treated as procedural irregularities, not conditions affecting the existence of the suit. A plaint signed by one of several plaintiffs was sufficient, and presentation was not confined to the plaintiff personally or to a particular authorised agent. Although verification by a person not shown to know the facts was defective, it remained a curable irregularity. Once corrected, the amendment related back to the original date of presentation, so the suit was not treated as instituted only from the date of rectification. The company's conversion from private to public did not alter its identity or invalidate the suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194990