<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1129 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables for both software development services and IT enabled services. It held that reimbursements of expenses should not be marked up and directed the exclusion of telecommunication and insurance expenses from both export turnover and total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1129 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables for both software development services and IT enabled services. It held that reimbursements of expenses should not be marked up and directed the exclusion of telecommunication and insurance expenses from both export turnover and total turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>