<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10184</link>
    <description>Where a competent statutory authority has accepted an assessee&#039;s closing stock under the sales tax law, income-tax authorities cannot, without any variation by that authority, disregard that accepted figure and make an addition under section 69 merely on the basis of a higher stock value found in seized documents. The accepted commercial tax return was treated as binding for income-tax purposes, so the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to adopt the higher seized figure. On that basis, the differential stock addition was held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 49 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10184</link>
      <description>Where a competent statutory authority has accepted an assessee&#039;s closing stock under the sales tax law, income-tax authorities cannot, without any variation by that authority, disregard that accepted figure and make an addition under section 69 merely on the basis of a higher stock value found in seized documents. The accepted commercial tax return was treated as binding for income-tax purposes, so the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to adopt the higher seized figure. On that basis, the differential stock addition was held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>