<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1282 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions on account of unaccounted and undisclosed investment under Section 69B and disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate additions and rejected the reliance on presumptions and documents seized from third parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1282 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the additions on account of unaccounted and undisclosed investment under Section 69B and disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii). The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence to substantiate additions and rejected the reliance on presumptions and documents seized from third parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>