<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 419 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349264</link>
    <description>A binding CBDT circular under section 119 treats additions as revenue neutral where enhanced business profits remain fully eligible for profit-linked deduction. On that basis, the Tribunal applied the same principle to disallowances under section 40(a)(i), even though the circular referred to section 40(a)(ia) illustratively. Because the assessee&#039;s business income was eligible for deduction under section 10A, the disputed disallowances had no real tax impact and the Revenue&#039;s appeal on those grounds was not maintainable. The connected grounds were therefore dismissed as academic in the presence of the deduction claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 419 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349264</link>
      <description>A binding CBDT circular under section 119 treats additions as revenue neutral where enhanced business profits remain fully eligible for profit-linked deduction. On that basis, the Tribunal applied the same principle to disallowances under section 40(a)(i), even though the circular referred to section 40(a)(ia) illustratively. Because the assessee&#039;s business income was eligible for deduction under section 10A, the disputed disallowances had no real tax impact and the Revenue&#039;s appeal on those grounds was not maintainable. The connected grounds were therefore dismissed as academic in the presence of the deduction claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>