<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 414 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of mistake application by M/s. Plastrulon Processors Ltd. regarding the demand of interest on duty liability. The Tribunal found that the demand of duty was set aside, and as the interest mentioned in the original order did not pertain to interest on duty but on other charges, the recovery of interest was deemed inappropriate. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the relevant paragraphs of the order, stating that since the demand of duty was set aside, there was no basis for the recovery of interest, and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 414 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of mistake application by M/s. Plastrulon Processors Ltd. regarding the demand of interest on duty liability. The Tribunal found that the demand of duty was set aside, and as the interest mentioned in the original order did not pertain to interest on duty but on other charges, the recovery of interest was deemed inappropriate. Consequently, the Tribunal modified the relevant paragraphs of the order, stating that since the demand of duty was set aside, there was no basis for the recovery of interest, and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>