<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the import of old/used photocopiers without a valid license under the Customs Act. The redemption fine was reduced to &amp;amp;8377; 2,33,000 from &amp;amp;8377; 4,00,000, while the penalty and enhanced value were upheld. The Tribunal considered the mis-description of goods and the absence of import restrictions for used photocopiers during the relevant period in modifying the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 412 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal regarding the import of old/used photocopiers without a valid license under the Customs Act. The redemption fine was reduced to &amp;amp;8377; 2,33,000 from &amp;amp;8377; 4,00,000, while the penalty and enhanced value were upheld. The Tribunal considered the mis-description of goods and the absence of import restrictions for used photocopiers during the relevant period in modifying the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>