<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 410 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349255</link>
    <description>The appellant violated export license conditions by exporting goods that did not meet composition requirements and misusing duty-free raw materials. Despite failing to contest evidence and discrepancies in quality tests, the appellant&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to license conditions, using raw materials correctly, effectively contesting evidence, and maintaining accurate records to prevent legal consequences and appeal dismissals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:57:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 410 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349255</link>
      <description>The appellant violated export license conditions by exporting goods that did not meet composition requirements and misusing duty-free raw materials. Despite failing to contest evidence and discrepancies in quality tests, the appellant&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The tribunal emphasized the significance of adhering to license conditions, using raw materials correctly, effectively contesting evidence, and maintaining accurate records to prevent legal consequences and appeal dismissals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>