https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349253 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the services provided by the appellant did not qualify as Clearing and Forwarding Agent services under the law. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon'ble Apex Court, emphasizing the specific activities required for such classification, which the appellant did not fulfill. The Tribunal's decision aligned with the legal interpretations of higher courts, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant due to the services not meeting the criteria for classification as Clearing and Forwarding Agent services. en-us Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 18:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349253 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the services provided by the appellant did not qualify as Clearing and Forwarding Agent services under the law. The decision was based on the precedent set by the Hon'ble Apex Court, emphasizing the specific activities required for such classification, which the appellant did not fulfill. The Tribunal's decision aligned with the legal interpretations of higher courts, ultimately finding in favor of the appellant due to the services not meeting the criteria for classification as Clearing and Forwarding Agent services. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349253