<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 400 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The Appellant was entitled to reverse proportionate credit, and the extended period of limitation and penalties were deemed inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 400 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands and penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority. The Appellant was entitled to reverse proportionate credit, and the extended period of limitation and penalties were deemed inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>