<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 397 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349242</link>
    <description>Packaged cement cleared in 50 kg bags to industrial or institutional consumers for their own use, and not for resale, falls within the statutory exclusion from MRP declaration requirements. On that basis, the exemption notification applicable to such clearances remains available, because the exclusion under the packaged commodities rules operates independently of the quantity condition. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions confirming that cement supplied to industrial or institutional consumers need not bear MRP and continues to qualify for concessional duty treatment. The refund eligibility granted by the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to verification of unjust enrichment, was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=492023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 397 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349242</link>
      <description>Packaged cement cleared in 50 kg bags to industrial or institutional consumers for their own use, and not for resale, falls within the statutory exclusion from MRP declaration requirements. On that basis, the exemption notification applicable to such clearances remains available, because the exclusion under the packaged commodities rules operates independently of the quantity condition. The Tribunal followed earlier decisions confirming that cement supplied to industrial or institutional consumers need not bear MRP and continues to qualify for concessional duty treatment. The refund eligibility granted by the Commissioner (Appeals), subject to verification of unjust enrichment, was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=349242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>